Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lisa Disch, Mathijs van de Sande, and Nadia Urbinati

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9781474442602

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: September 2019

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442602.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 09 April 2020

The constructivist paradox: contemporary protest movements and (their) representation

The constructivist paradox: contemporary protest movements and (their) representation

Chapter:
(p.239) 14 The constructivist paradox: contemporary protest movements and (their) representation
Source:
The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation
Author(s):

Mathijs van de Sande

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442602.003.0014

The recent global wave of protest movements is often characterized with reference to a ‘prefigurative politics’ and not without reason closely associated with a critique of representative democracy and its institutions. Chantal Mouffe has recently argued that the refusal by such movements to engage with representative institutions evinces a fundamental neglect of the ‘radical negativity’ that inheres in politics – and thus amounts to a fundamental misconception of politics itself. This chapter argues that Mouffe frames her verdict in terms and categories that are significantly at odds with those of these protest movements themselves. By failing to take into account their own understanding of either ‘success’ or ‘politics,’ she implicitly assumes a standpoint outside of – and thus flatly unaffected by – these movements’ interventions in a discursive reality. Mouffe takes up a position in analyzing these movements that seems immune to the constructivist turn that she herself has helped to theorize. This chapter poses this paradox and asks how political theorists are to deal with it. How to remain receptive to movement critiques of political representation without dismissing the insights of constructivist representation theory? And how to appreciate the representative functions that these movements did effectively fulfill?

Keywords:   Chantal Mouffe, Constructivist paradox, Protest movements, Prefigurative politics

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.