Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lisa Disch, Mathijs van de Sande, and Nadia Urbinati

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9781474442602

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: September 2019

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442602.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 09 April 2020

Power without representation is blind, representations without power are empty

Power without representation is blind, representations without power are empty

Chapter:
(p.65) 4 Power without representation is blind, representations without power are empty
Source:
The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation
Author(s):

Bernard Flynn

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442602.003.0004

In the modern period, power can be exercised only insofar as it is represented. This chapter develops this argument by a reading of Claude Lefort's interpretation of Machiavelli’s account of the metamorphosis by which natural force is transformed into political power: its being no longer located in the body(s) of the prince but rather in a symbolic register that is not reducible to real social processes. Michel Foucault has refused this "symbolic turn" and attached himself to an older tradition that equates desymbolization with secularization. Foucault pursues his analysis in accord with a tradition of "realism” that would unmask the representations of power, both juridical and symbolic, as occulting the true operation of power on the level of the real. His analysis maps grids of power and the resistances that they engender. He views power as being exercised directly on the body, without need of representation. His radical antinomianism has led him to very questionable judgments in concrete historical situations. This chapter argues that Foucault' de-symbolization has, as is the case with Marx, issued in a denegation of the political as such, a move that one would be ill advised to follow.

Keywords:   Michel Foucault, Claude Lefort, Symbolic turn, Realism

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.