Metaphorical Constraints: Making ‘Frenzy … Fine’
Metaphorical Constraints: Making ‘Frenzy … Fine’
Having emphasised the creative potential of erotic metaphor, Conceiving Desire in Lyly and Shakespeare concludes by reflecting on some of its limits, specifically the incapacities of any single metaphor to dramatize eros in all of its complexity. While Troilus considers his erotic limitations ‘monstruous,’ this section of the book probes the potential of such limits. Metaphorical constraints and entailments tether elusive erotic experiences to language and to the desiring body. This conclusion suggests that the process of constraining and limning eros through metaphor makes both love and lovers singular. For Troilus, as for so many of Shakespeare’s characters, contemplative speech brings coherence to physically incompatible sexual scenarios, making erotic experience startlingly new.
Keywords: Troilus and Cressida, Limit, Constraint, Entailment, Incompatible, Language
Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.