Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Adam Smith and RousseauEthics, Politics, Economics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Maria Pia Paganelli, Dennis C. Rasmussen, and Craig Smith

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9781474422857

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: September 2018

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474422857.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 29 March 2020

Sentimental Conviction: Rousseau’s Apologia and the Impartial Spectator

Sentimental Conviction: Rousseau’s Apologia and the Impartial Spectator

Chapter:
(p.166) 9 Sentimental Conviction: Rousseau’s Apologia and the Impartial Spectator
Source:
Adam Smith and Rousseau
Author(s):

Adam Schoene

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474422857.003.0009

Where Adam Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) extends the domain of spectatorship beyond the ocular realm and claims that we must become the impartial spectators of our own character and conduct, Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Rousseau juge de Jean-Jacques, Dialogues (1776) also attempts to probe beyond the visual surface to examine through careful study the constitution of another, who is actually himself. This chapter traces a Smithian sentiment in the radical division of the self dramatized in Rousseau’s fictional autobiographical Dialogues, emphasizing Rousseau’s attempt to liberate his own gaze and render an unbiased judgment upon himself. Although Rousseau does not write in direct discourse with Smith, he applies a strikingly similar rhetorical device to the spectator within the dialogic structure of his apologia. Reading Rousseau alongside Smith resituates the Dialogues not as a work of madness, as it has frequently been interpreted, but rather as an unrelenting struggle for justice.

Keywords:   Autobiographical, Impartial spectator, Judgment, Justice, Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Rousseau juge de Jean-Jacques Dialogues, Sentiment, Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Unbiased

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.