Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
American Grand Strategy under ObamaCompeting Discourses$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Georg Löfflmann

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9781474419765

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: January 2018

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474419765.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 03 April 2020

Think Tanks and the Washington Consensus on Hegemony

Think Tanks and the Washington Consensus on Hegemony

Chapter:
(p.119) Chapter 5 Think Tanks and the Washington Consensus on Hegemony
Source:
American Grand Strategy under Obama
Author(s):

Georg Löfflmann

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474419765.003.0006

This chapter investigates the grand strategy proposals by some of the leading think tanks operating in Washington DC, demonstrating how their nominally impartial, and independent research reveals a dominant, bipartisan neoconservative/liberal-internationalist consensus on hegemony that further underlines the intertextual and practical interconnection between research expertise, professional knowledge and policymaking. The think tanks examined in this chapter were selected to assess those formally independent research outputs with the greatest policy impact under the Obama presidency, while also reflecting the widest range of political views on American grand strategy. The chapter examines how organisations supporting deviant grand strategy discourses of libertarian restraint (Cato) and liberal-progressive cooperative security (CAP) have attempted to shift the public policy debate and how the stigma of isolationism underwrites a powerful status quo in Washington DC.

Keywords:   Washington consensus, Isolationism, Neo-conservatism, Libertarianism, Think Tanks, AEI, Brookings, Cato, Center for a New American Security (CNAS), Center for American Progress (CAP)

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.