Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Consequences of Possession$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Eric Descheemaeker

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780748693641

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: May 2015

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748693641.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 26 May 2020

Is Possession Factual or  Legal?

Is Possession Factual or  Legal?

Chapter:
(p.56) 3 Is Possession Factual or  Legal?
Source:
The Consequences of Possession
Author(s):

Descheemaeker Eric

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748693641.003.0003

Any attempt to define ‘possession’ has been called a ‘fruitless task’. This chapter explores the reason why an accepted definition of ‘possession’ has proved so elusive to common and civil lawyers alike. The argument developed is that the word ‘possession’ is frequently used by lawyers to denote different (albeit related) things. A clear example of these different usages can be found in the difference between using it to describe a physical relationship between a person and a thing and to describe a legal relationship between a person and a thing. These are fundamentally different types of relationship. However, lawyers experience a difficulty when they attempt to draw a clear distinction between these two different usages of ‘possession’: the reason for this is that the word is also used in a third sense. An example is the ‘fiction’ of possession, and the closely related concept of the ‘presumption’ of possession, both of which are frequently found in property law. When the word ‘possession’ is used to describe fictions and presumptions it is not being used to describe a physical relationship between a person and a thing, nor a legal relationship between persons and a thing, but something in between. The chapter explores this third sense of ‘possession’ and distinguishes it from the word’s other meanings.

Keywords:   English law, possession as right, possession as fact, fiction of possession, presumption of possession

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.