Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Just EnoughSufficiency As a Demand of Justice$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Liam Shields

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780748691869

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: January 2018

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748691869.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 06 July 2022

Conclusion

Conclusion

Chapter:
(p.193) 7 Conclusion
Source:
Just Enough
Author(s):

Liam Shields

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748691869.003.0007

This chapter summarises the main arguments of the book and the central claims of shift-sufficientarianism. The chapter speculates about the future for sufficientarianism and suggests that the view will have good prospects in the areas of non-ideal theory, and legitimacy and consensus, as well as health and taxation. The chapter also suggests that a more positive relationship between sufficientarianism and egalitarianism might emerge in the future from understanding sufficientarianism as shift-sufficientarianism

Keywords:   Non-Ideal Theory, Legitimacy, Social Egalitarianism, Summary

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.