Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Semantics of Word Formation and Lexicalization$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Pius ten Hacken and Claire Thomas

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780748689606

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: May 2014

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748689606.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 18 September 2021

Deverbal nominalizations in English

Deverbal nominalizations in English

an LMBM approach

Chapter:
(p.180) Chapter 10 Deverbal nominalizations in English
Source:
The Semantics of Word Formation and Lexicalization
Author(s):

Maria Bloch-Trojnar

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748689606.003.0010

The paper is an attempt at presenting an integrated account of systematic and idiosyncratic properties of deverbal nominalizations in English with the aid of Lexeme-Morpheme-Base Morphology (Beard 1995). LMBM is a lexeme-based, inferential-realizational theory of morphology which is built into a modular non-isomorphic architecture of grammar. The analysis addresses the grammatical, semantic, and formal aspects of deverbal noun formation in English. All derivational types are included, i.e. nominalizations marked with -ing, the so-called Latinate suffixes ((at)ion, ment, ance/ ence, age, al, etc.), as well as nominals formed by means of conversion. It is argued that deverbal nominalizations result from two distinct lexical rules deriving process (uncountable) and event (countable) nominalizations, productively marked by -ing and conversion respectively. The action/result dichotomy has to be explained by a different class of rules – performative speech act rules – not controlled by the functional subcomponent of the lexicon. It is demonstrated how the representation of regular nominalizations differs from that of lexicalized ones and how the morphological component, interwoven with other components, maps grammatical information to semantics and phonology.

Keywords:   deverbal nominalization, transposition, result nominal, LMBM, Separation Hypothesis

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.