Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Semantics of Word Formation and Lexicalization$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Pius ten Hacken and Claire Thomas

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780748689606

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: May 2014

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748689606.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 30 July 2021

Word formation, meaning and lexicalization

Word formation, meaning and lexicalization

Chapter:
(p.1) Chapter 1 Word formation, meaning and lexicalization
Source:
The Semantics of Word Formation and Lexicalization
Author(s):

Pius ten Hacken

Claire Thomas

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748689606.003.0001

This chapter gives a historical overview of the study of the semantic aspects of word formation and lexicalization. It starts with Saussure and the developments in the European tradition, including the Prague School, which pay a lot of attention to semantics. Also the classical terminological tradition of Wüster is included. The American tradition was much more reluctant to study meaning. Bloomfield’s approach was in this respect inherited by generative grammar. Current approaches in the European tradition include the onomasiological approach, both in word formation and terminology, which evolved from the Prague School. In generative grammar, Distributed Morphology (DM) continues the tradition that prioritises the form, but there are also approaches such as Jackendoff’s Parallel Architecture, Lieber’s lexical semantics of word formation, and Pustejovsky’s Generative Lexicon, which provide a much better background for the study of the semantics of word formation and lexicalization. In addition, Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar prioritizes semantic considerations and Beard’s Lexeme-Morpheme-Base Morphology tries to bridge the gap between the European and American traditions. The chapter gives an overview of the positions of each of these frameworks and the relations between them. Against this theoretical background, the individual chapters are presented.

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.