Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Philosophy Outside-InA Critique of Academic Reason$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christopher Norris

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780748684557

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: May 2014

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748684557.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 06 June 2020

Great Philosophy

Great Philosophy

Discovery, Invention and the Uses of Error

Chapter:
(p.61) Chapter 2 Great Philosophy
Source:
Philosophy Outside-In
Author(s):

Christopher Norris

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748684557.003.0003

Here I consider what is (or should be) meant by the description ‘great’ philosophy and offer some broadly applicable criteria by which to assess candidate thinkers or works. On the one hand are philosophers in whose case the epithet, even if contested, is not just the product of doctrinal adherence among those who apply it. On the other are thinkers – however acute or technically adroit – to whom its application is inappropriate because their work cannot justifiably be held to rise to a level of creative-exploratory thought where the description would have any meaningful purchase. I suggest that great philosophy should be thought of as involving a readiness to venture speculative hypotheses beyond any limits typically imposed by a culture of ‘safe’, academically sanctioned debate. At the same time it must be subject to the strictest standards of logic and conceptual precision. Focusing on Derrida and Badiou I maintain that these criteria are more often met by philosophers in the broadly ‘continental’ rather than the mainstream ‘analytic’ line of descent. However the very possibility of meeting them, and of their being jointly met by any one thinker, is itself sufficient indication that this is a false and pernicious dichotomy.

Keywords:   Austin, Badiou, creativity, Derrida, error, great philosophy, knowledge, speculative thought, truth

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.