Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Contemporary IjtihadLimits and Controversies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

L. Ali Khan and Hisham M. Ramadan

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780748641284

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748641284.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 15 October 2019

Western Views of Islamic Law

Western Views of Islamic Law

Chapter:
6 Western Views of Islamic Law
Source:
Contemporary Ijtihad
Author(s):

Khan L. Ali

M. Ramadan Hisham

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748641284.003.0006

This chapter examines the external scholarship, authored by non-Muslims, about Islam and Islamic law, asking the question of whether such scholarship can be effective in influencing contemporary ijtihad. External scholarship, mostly published in the West, can influence contemporary ijtihad by demonstrating the way to improve some sources of Islamic positive law. It can also be highly influential in specialised markets such as finance where non-Muslim experts can offer advice in forming technical rules. While external scholarship can be influential, it faces opposition and difficulty, particularly when it aims to improve or modify the rules of fiqh derived from divine texts. This opposition to the engagement of external scholarship with the fiqh markets can be attributed to two factors: first, fiqh markets do not allow non-Muslim jurists to interpret the Basic Code for the benefit or to the detriment of Muslim communities; and second, they do not allow criticisms of the Basic Code. In this chapter, the discussion focuses on the principles of scholarly engagement, which are heavily dictated by the fundamental distinction between muminin (believers) and munkirin (non-believers). It also focuses on the disengagement principle, which disregards deviant writings or kurf scholarship on Islam. Defamatory scholarship is discussed, together with cases that exemplify attacks on and disrespect towards the Islamic law and principles. Among these examples are attacks on the Qur'an and defamatory scholarship on the Prophet Muhammad. The chapter also discusses dubious scholarship. This type of scholarship is founded on questionable assumptions about Islam that raise serious and difficult questions, which the fiqh market must answer. An example of such dubious scholarship is the scholarship on Sunnah which concluded that the entire enterprise of the Sunnah was fabricated and fraudulent. Discussed also is the presentation of geopolitical rivalries in external scholarship, which concludes that Islam is inherently violent. The chapter ends with a discussion on some of the popular protests hurtled by Muslims against external attacks on the Basic Code and the Prophet, and on Islam as a whole.

Keywords:   external scholarship, non-Muslims, contemporary ijtihad, muminin, munkirin, kurf scholarship, defamatory scholarship, dubious scholarship

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.