Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Gillian RoseA Good Enough Justice$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Kate Schick

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780748639847

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748639847.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 28 July 2021

Cosmopolitanism, Difference and Aporetic Universalism

Cosmopolitanism, Difference and Aporetic Universalism

Chapter:
(p.81) Chapter 4 Cosmopolitanism, Difference and Aporetic Universalism
Source:
Gillian Rose
Author(s):

Kate Schick

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748639847.003.0005

This chapter advocates Rose's aporetic universalism as an alternative approach to thinking about exclusion and the Other. Liberal cosmopolitanism advocates legal equality as a redress for exclusion; however, the focus on equal rights too often obscures difference and fosters further marginalisation. Postmodern thought promotes the celebration of difference to counter suppression of particularity; however, this too can work against understanding by reifying identities in rigid classification and failing to examine their relatedness to one another or their location in social and political structures. Aporetic universalism, in contrast, begins in the middle: it attends to the mismatch between liberal cosmopolitan promises and social and political actualities, insisting that we journey towards recognition of ourselves and of others. The journey towards recognition is firmly embedded in an understanding of law, broadly conceived: the web of practices and norms that foster recognition and misrecognition. It is also inherently risk-filled: the process of reflection on structures of misrecognition and our own complicities in structures of domination is deeply political.

Keywords:   Exclusion, Difference, Cosmopolitanism, The Other, Aporetic universalism, Recognition

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.