Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Mixed Jurisdictions ComparedPrivate Law in Louisiana and Scotland$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Vernon Palmer and Elspeth Reid

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780748638864

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748638864.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 09 August 2020

Hunting Promissory Estoppel

Hunting Promissory Estoppel

Chapter:
(p.281) 10 Hunting Promissory Estoppel
Source:
Mixed Jurisdictions Compared
Author(s):

David V Snyder

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748638864.003.0020

Promissory estoppel came into Louisiana silently, as it pervaded the rest of the United States, under the guises of other doctrines. Even after Williston discovered the hidden current in the American case law and named it ‘promissory estoppels’ (to distinguish it from equitable estoppel), the doctrine remained unacknowledged in Louisiana. With its Civil Law heritage Louisiana had no need to fix Common Law problems, it was thought, and promissory estoppel was only a tool for Common Law repairs. This thinking turned, though, and the state has now enshrined promissory estoppel in the Civil Code. In Scotland, on the other hand, a distinctive law of promise had been introduced centuries earlier. Even Adam Smith and David Hume interested themselves in promises and their place in the law, and in Smith's case, in Scots law particularly. This doctrine would seem to leave no room for promissory estoppel, which has therefore been kept out. This background, and these differing results, made promissory estoppel an enticing prospect for a study of two mixed jurisdictions, each of which is characterised by its own internal relationship between Civil Law and Common Law. The story told in this chapter, comparing Louisiana and Scotland, is an examination of the intricate relationship between these two sets of relationships.

Keywords:   promissory estoppels, Louisiana law, Scots law, civil law, common law, mixed jurisdictions

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.