Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic ExperimentThe Case of Modern Norwegian$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ernst Jahr

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780748637829

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: January 2015

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748637829.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 03 April 2020

The post-war language struggle (1945–66) to counter the sociolinguistic experiment of 1938

The post-war language struggle (1945–66) to counter the sociolinguistic experiment of 1938

Chapter:
(p.127) Chapter 7 The post-war language struggle (1945–66) to counter the sociolinguistic experiment of 1938
Source:
Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment
Author(s):

Ernst Håkon Jahr

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748637829.003.0007

The supporters of pre-1938-Bokmål could not accept that standard Bokmål no longer allowed every upper-class oral form (like it did before). They resented the political aims of the Labour party – to develop a pan-Norwegian standard through the promotion in writing of speech forms shared by a vast majority of the Norwegian people. The pre-1938-Bokmål supporters saw their struggle as a fight for linguistic freedom and for what they termed a ‘free language development’. The language struggle of the 1950s was intense. Even though the Riksmål (pre-1938-Bokmål) advocates at the time did not understand that their cause was steadily winning ground, the high level of activity and the vast resources employed by business and private persons paid off in the long run. The repeated attacks on the official language policy caused the party of government, the Labour party, gradually to see its identification with the pan-Norwegian policy as a negative factor. In the long run the sociolinguistic experiment of 1938 proved difficult to defend. An official ‘Language Peace Commission’ recommended 1966 that upper-class forms which were made non-standard in 1938 should again be part of standard Bokmål. This marked the end of the sociopolitical period of language planning (1917-66).

Keywords:   sociopolitical period, language struggle, ‘free language development’, Language Peace Commission, Pan-Norwegian, Pan-Norwegian policy, Riksmål

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.