Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Public Violence in Islamic SocietiesPower, Discipline, and the Construction of the Public Sphere, 7th-19th Centuries CE$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christian Lange and Maribel Fierro

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780748637317

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748637317.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 26 May 2020

Concepts of justice and the catalogue of punishments under the Sultans of Delhi (7th–8th/13th–14th centuries)

Concepts of justice and the catalogue of punishments under the Sultans of Delhi (7th–8th/13th–14th centuries)

Chapter:
(p.238) 11 Concepts of justice and the catalogue of punishments under the Sultans of Delhi (7th–8th/13th–14th centuries)
Source:
Public Violence in Islamic Societies
Author(s):

Blain Auer

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748637317.003.0012

This chapter discusses the boundaries between religious and political legitimacy during the 7th–8th/13th–14th centuries in Northern India. In an age that saw the Delhi Sultanate expand its rule to the entire Indian subcontinent, the sources for legitimacy were deeply contested in historical writings and were particularly acute in narratives highlighting the justice and punishment of kings. These historical narratives of the sultan demonstrate a structural problem in the legitimacy of the Delhi Sultanate. The question of who has the authority to issue the ultimate form of punishment, the death penalty and in what cases and for which crimes reveal the ambiguity and inherent tension in the structures of power. The accounts of punishment during these periods show that the boundaries of sultanic authority were determined by institutional and theoretical structures but also by the power of the office of sultan. Although the sharī'a was integral to judicial systems necessary for the proper functioning of the Sultanate, it stood in relation to the executive authority of the sultan, who, within loose limit was able to enact laws outside of the sharī 'a, but legitimated on thedavabīt and models of pre-Islamic Persian kings. Among the topics discussed in this chapter are the concepts of punishments (siyāsa) and the outbreak of resistance to the rule of Sultan Muhammad b. Tughluq.

Keywords:   religious legitimacy, political legitimacy, Northern India, Delhi Sultanate, punishment, sharī'a, davabīt, siyāsa

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.