This chapter concludes the book by accepting that there are significant barriers to a transition to deliberative and associational democracy. It notes that the arguments in the book should be seen as a series of suggestions and proposals, rather than a prediction of how democracy might develop. However, normative ideas are still important, and the book hopes that readers will find some of the suggestions for a deliberative and associational democracy compelling enough that they too might hope the changes called for here occur. The chapter maintains that all of these arguments are at their most persuasive when they are connected, that autonomy is a very important value, that deliberative democracy is a desirable method of making decisions because it enhances autonomy, and that secondary associations are unavoidable political facts which can, if structured correctly, help institutionalise deliberative democracy.
Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.