Hegel's views on morality have attracted much controversy, particularly with regard to his criticisms of Kant's moral theory. Famously, Hegel accused Kantian morality of being overly formalistic and lacking in content. Kant's defenders have argued that Hegel's criticisms fall wide of the mark, while Hegel's admirers, such as F. H. Bradley, claim his criticisms ‘annihilated’ Kant's theory. Both sides offer a compelling picture, and the debate between the two is seemingly intractable, with neither side willing to concede much ground. This chapter offers a new position on this old debate, beginning with an analysis of Hegel's peculiar understanding of morality and what it can achieve. It examines Hegel's uncharitable characterization of Kant's moral theory and why Hegel finds it unsatisfying. This discussion is followed by a revealing look at section 270 and its long remark in the Philosophy of Right, where Hegel discusses the relationship between religion and the state. The final section makes clear that Kant's general project, as commonly understood, can be accommodated in this part of Hegel's views.
Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.