Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A Mixed Legal System in TransitionT. B. Smith and the Progress of Scots Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Elspeth Reid and David Carey Miller

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780748623358

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748623358.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM EDINBURGH SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.edinburgh.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Edinburgh University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in ESO for personal use.date: 28 March 2020

Borrowing from English Equity and Minority Shareholders’ Actions

Borrowing from English Equity and Minority Shareholders’ Actions

Chapter:
(p.100) 5 Borrowing from English Equity and Minority Shareholders’ Actions
Source:
A Mixed Legal System in Transition
Author(s):

Niall R Whitty

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748623358.003.0005

In Anderson v Hogg a shareholder in a company presented a petition under section 459 of the Companies Act 1985 for relief against unfair prejudice. The petitioner sought to have the respondent ordained to repay to the company sums which the company had paid to the respondent by way of allegedly unauthorised salary bonus, redundancy payments, and the like. In the Outer House, Lord Reed found that the various payments did not result in unfair prejudice to the petitioning shareholder and refused the petition. This chapter argues that the traditional Scottish scepticism about equity as a source is well justified. In particular, it is justified by among other things the very policy against unwise anglicisation which Sir Thomas normally preached. More specifically, the chapter contends that it is misleading to say that the Court of Session has an equitable jurisdiction comparable to that of the English Court of Chancery; that we do not need such a jurisdiction; and what is more we are better off without it.

Keywords:   Anderson v Hogg, Companies Act 1985, unfair prejudice, equity, anglicization, Sir Thomas Smith, Court of Session, jurisdiction, Court of Chancery

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.