Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Rethinking Shakespeare's Political PhilosophyFrom Lear to Leviathan$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Alex Schulman

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780748682416

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: September 2015

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748682416.001.0001

Show Summary Details

Brave New Worlds

Brave New Worlds

(p.196) Epilogue Brave New Worlds
Rethinking Shakespeare's Political Philosophy

Alex Schulman

Edinburgh University Press

This concluding chapter affirms that long before contemporary critical theory, social contract's most famous theorists have already discussed that control is the disturbing mirror of consent. John Locke's second Treatise on Civil Government implies that Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan's conjuring of absolute sovereignty from natural anarchy expels one domination only by producing another. Jean Jacques Rousseau's Du Contrat Social criticises post-Lockean parliamentary liberalism, and states that free societies must declassify wealth and power, while Locke claims that God created, and thus ‘owns’ mankind. All of these thinkers, like Shakespeare, are trying to make sense of a ‘brave new world’ that seeks to depart from inherited constraint, yet still recognise the traditional wisdom whereby everything is embedded.

Keywords:   contemporary critical theory, social contract, John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Jean Jacques Rousseau, William Shakespeare

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.