Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Pursuing the GoodEthics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Douglas Cairns and Fritz-Gregor Herrmann

Print publication date: 2007

Print ISBN-13: 9780748628117

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748628117.001.0001

Show Summary Details

Neutralism In Book I of the Republic

Neutralism In Book I of the Republic

Chapter:
(p.76) 4 Neutralism In Book I of the Republic
Source:
Pursuing the Good
Author(s):

George Rudebusch

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748628117.003.0005

This chapter shows that both the ruler-qua-ruler argument and the rulers-in-our-cities argument refute Thrasymachus' doctrine that the truly wise are egoists. Those arguments establish the thesis of wisdom's neutralism, not altruism. While Tony Chu's argument would establish that, after all, the wise must be egoists, his argument depends upon two false premises, C1 and C2. The falsity of these premises is further support for the thesis of wisdom's neutralism. The wise ruler qua ruler, who rules freely and agent neutrally, is a person. This wise person does not rule involuntarily and subordinated to his own needs, as do the rulers identified in T by Thrasymachus.

Keywords:   Thrasymachus, ruler-qua-ruler, egoists, wisdom

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.