Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Associationism and the Literary ImaginationFrom the Phantasmal Chaos$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Cairns Craig

Print publication date: 2007

Print ISBN-13: 9780748609123

Published to Edinburgh Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748609123.001.0001

Show Summary Details

‘Kant has not answered Hume’: Hume, Coleridge and the Romantic Imagination

‘Kant has not answered Hume’: Hume, Coleridge and the Romantic Imagination

Chapter:
(p.41) 1 ‘Kant has not answered Hume’: Hume, Coleridge and the Romantic Imagination
Source:
Associationism and the Literary Imagination
Author(s):

Cairns Craig

Publisher:
Edinburgh University Press
DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748609123.003.0002

This chapter discusses the concept of, and the views of several notable thinkers on, imagination. It identifies the differences between David Hume and Samuel Taylor Coleridge's versions of imagination. While Hume viewed imagination as purely social and could create endless associations, Coleridge conceived of it as a representation of a better account of the creative mind. It is shown that association works together with imagination, as it provides the mechanical materials which are transformed into an organic order. Romanticism is also discussed in the chapter.

Keywords:   imagination, David Hume, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, creative mind, association, mechanical materials, Romanticism

Edinburgh Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.